Thursday, March 5, 2026

Literary Estates

 

I am traveling at the moment so can’t do my weekly Publishing News, Book Marketing, and Writing Craft roundup. I started the blog to learn about publishing nearly eighteen years ago, and in the spirit of always learning I’ve written some articles on important topics for a writer to consider. These are my thoughts. It is not legal advice. Hopefully, I can shed some light on the subject of Literary Estates.

 

Last week I wrote about copyright and some of the ideas behind how it started and how it has changed over the last two centuries. This week I want to talk about Literary Estates. I touched on the subject briefly last week when I talked about the length of copyright. The length of your copyright lasts until fifty years after your death here in New Zealand or seventy years after your death in the UK or USA. So, all those books you have been selling on Amazon are your property and part of your literary estate until seventy years after your death. 

 

Your literary estate has value. It can be used in a divorce settlement as an asset. We saw last year how authors caught up in the Unbound mess couldn’t get their rights back to their own work. Bankruptcy law deemed their acquired works an asset of the Unbound company. Bankruptcy law trumps copyright law unless there is a specific clause about publisher bankruptcy in the contract. 

 

At the moment, our family is grappling with the literary estate of a family member who is now needing care. Our family member was a romance author and published over two hundred novels, short stories, poems and had an award-winning story turned into a film. A lifetimes literary work which still brings in royalties and remains an asset until seventy years after their death. As it is unlikely that the children will be around until copyright expires, a chat with the grandchildren was important as they will be looking after the estate. 

 

First, we needed to find all the contracts and get them into a database. Our family member is too ill to deal with this. Luckily contracts were filed in paper and put into file boxes and then into cardboard boxes. In between moves they ended up in strange places, so we are still hunting down some boxes, but we think we have the bulk of them. We are dealing with contracts from the 80’s until the 2010’s we think. We don’t know if there are electronic contracts for books floating around that might not have been printed out and stored. It is very useful to have all your contracts in one place, printed, and easily accessible. (If the contracts are electronic, will you be able to read them in the future? Printing them out means they are still readable if technology gets outdated.)

 

When looking through these old contracts you are struck by the dense language first. Some contracts are twenty pages or more of legalese which strains average comprehension. You can imagine how difficult it would be for anyone inheriting such a complex task if they have no idea what a publishing contract entails. I photocopied one and then went through the copy with a high lighter explaining all the terms to the grandchildren. They are adults with degrees, and they still found it confusing. Don’t expect that your heirs will even know what a royalty means.

 

One of the hardest jobs we have is matching books to contracts. A lot of contracts were for multiple books named as The Work One, The Work Two, The Work Three etc. If we are lucky the contract specified the title, but often the title changed between signing the contract and publication. We must work from the publication date. This is where the imprint or verso page is important in a book. If we have a physical copy of the book, we can check copyright dates and match them up with the contracts. Then we can note down the books we think apply to each contract. If you have multi book contracts -jot down the titles on the contract, your heirs will thank you. To help us we took pictures of the cover and imprint page of every physical copy of the books. The short stories are more problematical unless they were in collected works or anthologies. We know some are buried in computer files.

 

The next important thing is rights. What rights are available or reserved to the publisher? Short stories often have first publication right contracts. The film that was made was from an award-winning short story. It is very common for short stories to be adapted into films. With novel contracts the publishers wanted ‘all rights for all forms of publication now and to be invented in the future.’ When you read this in a contract written in the 1980’s you have to admire the publisher’s lawyers who wrote these complex documents. They were trying to cover everything. Just think about all the publication forms and new rights invented in the last forty years and what might be invented in the next forty years. 

 

Now you might be thinking who would want to republish a book from the 1980’s or a short story from then? Well as it happens, publishing houses. All these contracts represent Intellectual Property that they own a piece of. It’s an asset. And when there is a new publishing format they want to use as many assets as they can to earn as much money as possible.

Recently our local weekly bestseller list had six books out of ten of a beloved local children’s author’s book. They were all format variations of the original story published in 1983. The author is still alive. The small publishing house that published the original book series was swallowed up by a big publisher. They are doing very well from their Intellectual Property acquisition with the merchandise and international sales featuring the famous character.

 

In the 1980’s manga comics was a small niche publication only found in Japan, printed on cheap paper. In the last ten years the publishing world discovered manga. The romance manga genre is huge and they love classic tales. Publishing companies have been mining their backlists for suitable stories for the new format. 

The first we knew about this romance goldmine was when some manga books arrived at the house, to the consternation of our frail family member. What were these books? We needed to translate from the Japanese to find out that they were new books using old stories. There were no letters in the package, just the books. The original stories had been first published over twenty-five years before and they were having another outing in an overseas market.

Was their publication an extension of the original contract? The books were published by the Japanese branch of the publishing house. Graphic novels weren’t specified in the original contract, but translation is. Had these stories been published originally in Japanese? We don’t know. Is this a reprint or a new format? It is probably covered by the contract phrase ‘all forms of publication and those yet to be invented.’

 

Periodically money arrives in a bank account. We have to go through emails and royalty statements and track which stories they might be from. All of this would be easy if the author was well but add in failing health, and severe memory issues and you have a mountain of work to make sense of.

We sat down with our family member and discussed their wishes for the literary estate. We put together a list of questions we needed answers for. Some scenarios we thought might be wildly improbable, for example would you allow your stories to be used in adult films? No. The wildly improbable can happen. No one, least of all the author, predicted that their stories would live on in Manga novels. Would you allow a film adaptation bringing the story into the present day? It depends on the story. Would you allow the original story to be updated? No. 

Now we have a working document roughed out, we are using that as our plan going forward for any literary estate decisions. This helps everyone involved know what the creator wished when they are no longer able to tell us.

 

Literary estate heirs need to keep the literary estate current and findable. This is so people can contact the estate for reprint permissions. Sometimes this is a landing page or a website with contact details. Publishers and editors move on, so making it easy for anthology editors to contact the estate is important. The second is a bank account for ongoing royalties and to deal with taxes. This can be tricky if the estate is for a deceased author. This is where lawyers and trusts come in. 

 

There is a lot to figure out with this estate and it’s not one of the high-profile ones. Our author was a successful midlist author, often invited to contribute to anthologies and textbooks on writing. When they stopped publishing, they didn’t have an agent. It is down to their family to manage the reprints, the new publications, the requests for quotes or poems. If an agent was still involved, things might be very different. In agent contracts there is sometimes a clause granting management of author estates to the agent. The agents have a stake in the literary estate because they get paid a percentage for every contract they negotiate for the life of copyright. For some, managing an estate for the heirs is their sole job. Literary agencies are often bought and sold based on the Intellectual Property they manage. Based on some of the contracts I have read, a slice of royalties can still be going to a long swallowed up agency for years. The Authors Guild supported Harper Lee over just this problem.

 

Heirs don’t necessarily mean family members. Beatrix Potter’s literary estate went to Frederick Warne, her publisher. They stopped publishing other authors and concentrated on Beatrix. That is the sole reason they are still in business, just to manage the Beatrix Potter literary estate. 

In some wills the literary estate can be settled on trusted friends, an institution, a charity or to a trust to benefit a particular cause. In the UK the author of Peter Pan, James Matthew Barrie signed over all proceeds from Peter Pan to the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children. When the end of J M Barrie’s copyright drew near, the trustees of the hospital petitioned the UK parliament to allow them to keep the rights. (It helped that the Prime Minister’s wife was a hospital trustee.) A special law called The Peter Pan law was passed granting the hospital all rights in perpetuity. 

Sometimes literary estate heirs can generate a lot of controversy as in the case of Harper Lee. Many called into question the actions of a lawyer who said they were the sole beneficiary of the Lee estate. It was noted that Lee was medically incapacitated and somehow granted permission for a hidden manuscript to be published sixty years after her only book To Kill A Mockingbird was published. Of course, the sales were excellent for the publisher.

 

Our experience shows the need for writers to be thinking about the work that they are leaving behind. We are lucky that the contracts were filed in folders and boxes and clearly labelled as contracts. We are also lucky that there are family members who have some knowledge of publishing and what these contracts represent. The family member in charge of finances looked quite sick when I had to explain that accounts needed to be kept open and why. Everybody now understands the amount of work involved.

 

We had already started getting the estate in order when the Anthropic AI case came along. The literary estate has to file claims for all the books that were scraped illegally. Only a fraction of these books were registered with the US copyright office. The amount of money that could have been claimed if the publishers had registered all the books just from the literary estate we are dealing with, is an eye watering sum. There will be author estates whose heirs have no idea that they are eligible for compensation. Publishers may be dealing with compensation claims and have no way of finding beneficiaries. And this is only the first of the AI scraping of copyrighted works to be settled. There are more coming.

 

If you want to find out more about what you need to do to prepare your literary estate- Check out the two excellent books by Michael Le Ronn, who is an advisor to The Alliance of Independent Authors. The Author Heir Handbook and The Author Estate Handbook by M L Ronn. They are excellent guidebooks in thinking about the future of your literary estate and preparing for the future. 

Your heirs will thank you.

 

 

Copyright Maureen Crisp 2026

@craicer

 

Do you want the best of my bookmarked links in a handy monthly newsletter? You can subscribe here to join our happy band.

If you want the weekly blog in your inbox subscribe to the free Substack version.

If you like the blog and want to buy me a coffee, I appreciate the virtual coffee love. Thanks.

 

 

Photo by Emanuela Picone on Unsplash

Thursday, February 26, 2026

Understanding Copyright.

 I am traveling at the moment so can’t do my weekly Publishing News, Book Marketing, and Writing Craft roundup. I started the blog to learn about publishing nearly eighteen years ago, and in the spirit of always learning I’ve written some articles on important topics for a writer to consider. These are my thoughts. It is not legal advice. Hopefully, I can shed some light on the subject of Copyright 


It is Summer down under and while my writing brain takes a break from the current Work In Progress (WIP from the Fiction Overseer-er) I picked up a book on the history of copyright. I then proceeded to bore the family with what I thought were fascinating facts about the evolution of copyright.

 

For example, when the printing press was in its infancy, the printers wanted to make use of the technology, i.e. earn some money, so they printed pamphlets from anyone who wanted to get their ideas out to the people. They bought the right to copy the idea in printed form. This brought the printers into conflict with the authorities. They didn’t want just anybody being able to print information to the public. The public might get the wrong ideas. Printers were told they had to print the names of these idea rabble rousers so the authorities knew who to go after, otherwise they would be prosecuted. As this meant execution or hefty fines the printers quickly complied. From this practice of naming the author, the printer was absolved and notoriety was bestowed. Fame and fortune usually followed, sometimes just ahead of the police. Thomas Paine made a quick buck in three countries printing his revolutionary ideas before skipping town ahead of the executioner. (See Thomas Paine’s life for all the details.)

 

What does the term copyright mean for us now? 

In its most basic form copyright is an intellectual property law that grants creators exclusive rights to their original works once they are recorded in a fixed form. The important parts of the previous sentence are original creator, exclusive right, once they are recorded and fixed form.

 

Fixed Form

Ownership of an ideas starts from the time it is written down. Print is usually the first fixed form. (If you want to be extra careful about when you created a character or novel idea, date your drafts.) Translations then opened up a pandoras box of problems as historically translators asserted copyright over the translated work. They sold the work as for their own profit cutting out the original creator. Eventually this was resolved by assigning only the copyright of the translation to the translator, and a license fee to translate was negotiated to benefit the original creator. 

 

In the twentieth century along came the invention of audio and visual media. With the invention of mass media entertainment companies needed Intellectual Property. Contracts with the original creators began to get complicated. A contract written on a napkin after a boozy lunch wasn’t going to be sufficient anymore. In the twenty-first century computer code arrived and was considered as equal to books, art, and music. The code behind the software of the screen you are reading this on is copyrighted. As technology advances copyright laws get tested. It is a very complex collection of rights and laws. 

Right now countries are grappling with works that are produced with Artificial Intelligence (or really complex computer code.) What laws should be in place to protect the creator of the code? In some early test cases the legal opinion is whoever generated the prompt to the AI is the copyright owner of what it produces. Artificial Intelligence is just a tool of production, similar to a pen. However, every country is approaching AI copyright works differently and what might be fine in your country won’t be somewhere else.

 

Exclusive Rights

As printers evolved into publishers and new ways of sharing the information became profitable, contracts assigning exclusive rights became more important.

Could the creator be tempted to assign exclusive rights to a printer publisher? What can the publisher expect to make from the exclusive right to the creator’s work. A good Return On Investment is at least 25% annually. The publishing model is a risky business. To make a profit a publisher needs a good performing piece of Intellectual Property. 

Choosing a profitable work is difficult. Which work will generate profit? Nobody knows, for the public taste is fickle. For every ten works a publisher might acquire only one may take off and earn lots of money. And you don’t know which one of the ten it will be. If you have a hit, you need as many exclusive rights as possible to get as much money from the work as possible. Contracts between publisher and author hinge on how many exclusive rights the publisher can acquire from the author just in case this work is the one work that will generate a profit or be the next Harry Potter franchise. (Bloomsbury was looking pretty shaky when they acquired Harry Potter. They didn’t know until the third book sold out how big the phenomenon was likely to be and it saved their publishing company.)

 

The best description I have ever found on what exclusive rights are is Dean Wesley Smith’s book on copyright, The Magic Bakery. Here he breaks down Intellectual Property and copyright as slices of the one pie that is the exclusive work of the author creator in its first fixed form. Dean’s book is well worth reading and will grow your mind and give you a much better understanding of what the author creator actually owns and why Intellectual Property is so valuable that corporations spend billions of dollars just to get access to Intellectual Property assets.

To show you the potential value of Intellectual Property let’s look at just one right, the exclusive right to the audio production of a work, (a novel pie.) This can be sliced into narrator only, translation narrator only, multi voice narration, translated multi voice narration, audio drama, translation audio drama, soundtracks, abridged audio production, audio serialisation, and on into radio broadcast rights which opens up another big pie of rights to slice. And this is just for the first time these rights will be used. If the book has an updated second edition, it starts all over again.

 

Once upon a time

The words, ‘once it is recorded’, don’t look like they are important, but they are. From the time of creation, and then publication, copyright resides with the creator. Every country has a law that determines the length of time a copyright is valid. For us here in New Zealand our government says fifty years after the creator’s death. In the United States it is seventy years after the creator’s death. This means that creators need their heirs to know what they are doing with Intellectual Property. Your literary estate lives on after your death. However, there is a much more immediate clause in your contract about time, and that is the length of time the creator assigns an exclusive right.

Many author creators are so happy that a publisher wants to take their book that they quickly sign a contract and send it back without realising some of the implications and rights they have signed away. The words ‘in perpetuity’ mean forever. The phrase ‘for the entire life of the copyright,’ means, if the publisher is in the United States, seventy years after your death. The words world wide or universal rights means in any other language than the original language and the term universal rights covers any potential publication on another planet. You might think it’s funny but lawyers who write contracts have thought of it. Project out seventy years from when you turn one hundred and think about space exploration for a moment.

Time can be a good negotiating tool. For example, you can offer a publisher exclusive rights for a set period of time and then the rights revert back to you. Amazon has exclusive rights for seven years to your audio book if you publish through their audio book platform. If your book is going to be the next big franchise hit, and that increasingly depends on the marketing budget to get the word out, five to ten years is a good rule of thumb and one that agents are now writing into contracts. Reversion of rights is important and putting a time limit on exclusive rights gives the publisher a reasonable time frame to exploit the rights they have to the fullest. They may choose not to do anything or to let some rights slide as not important to be bothered with. Brandon Sanderson’s publisher let Brandon keep the rights to special editions on his first book. He was an unknown writer. Fantasy wasn’t that big of a deal. The tenth anniversary of the first books publication came around, and Brandon decided to have a kick starter campaign for a special edition. He wasn’t expecting forty million dollars to be pledged by the end of the campaign, and neither was his publisher who didn’t get a cent. You can just imagine how carefully Brandon’s publisher’s lawyers are going over the contracts to see what else they can make money on.

On January 1st every year a list is published of works that have come out of copyright. This can be a potential bonanza for publishers who can publish editions of famous books and not have to give literary estates anything. The character Miss Marple came out of copyright this year. Hopefully she won’t star in a slasher movie like Winnie the Pooh did the year following his copyright expiry date.

 

Copyright going forward.

The recent class action against Anthropic hinged on whether Anthropic paid for the books used to train their Claude Artificial Intelligence. If they had bought a copy of the book then, the judge said, it would be fair use to teach AI from it. After all students read and learn from textbooks. However, Anthropic programmers used a pirate site to get the books. Because they were using stolen property they needed to pay compensation to the copyright holders. With over 400,000 works identified as being copied, Anthropic settled out of court for one billion dollars, and the copyright holders are now working through their claim forms. The copyright holders of translated works will have to bring separate claims against Anthropic. The lawyers dealing with the claim are only dealing with works published in the United States and registered with the United States copyright authority for the purposes of legal protection. Unfortunately, a lot of authors found out their publisher had not registered their copyright claim (you can register anytime up to five years from first publication if you want to take legal action in the USA) and so they and their publisher are missing out on the settlement compensation. 

There are more class actions going through the courts against other AI companies. Some AI companies have decided it is better to pay for a license to use a publisher’s backlist, trusting that the publisher will pass on compensation to copyright holders. Contract lawyers might have got there first though with the phrase ‘and other means of publication yet to be invented,’ a nice catch all phrase that has been a feature of publisher’s contracts for decades.

 

Copyright is an important subject that gets glossed over. If corporations can spend millions acquiring the rights to music, or film, or games, or characters, or any sort of Intellectual Property then the original creator needs to understand the value of their work and protect it. You might wake up tomorrow to discover that your work is a runaway success, and you aren’t entitled to a cent. 

Your copyright is an asset judged by the courts. It is property and worth something. It can be used in a divorce settlement or a bankruptcy. If you understand the value of it first, you may save yourself an expensive mistake.

 

Hopefully, I have helped you understand a little more about the subject. I am always asking my young friends who want to be lawyers if they have thought about going into intellectual property law. It is the key to most entertainment law and where else can you get your name into the credits of movies, games, and acknowledgements.

 

If you are interested in further reading on the subject, check out Dean Wesley Smith’s book. The Magic Bakery 

Who Owns This Sentence by Alexandre Montagu and David Bellos - print copies at your local bookshop or on Amazon

 

Copyright Maureen Crisp 2026

@craicer

 

Do you want the best of my bookmarked links in a handy monthly newsletter? You can subscribe here to join our happy band.

If you want the weekly blog in your inbox subscribe to the free Substack version.

If you like the blog and want to buy me a coffee, I appreciate the virtual coffee love. Thanks.

 

 

Photo by Emanuela Picone on Unsplash

Related Posts with Thumbnails